EDR-XDR-SIEM Testing

for Attack Visibility and Telemetry Assessment

ico Attack Visibility in EDR XDR Telemetry
AVLab CERT EDR XDR GOLD 2026
AVLab CERT EDR XDR 2026

Validation of Telemetry, Correlation, and Attack Reconstruction Through Multi-Stage Attack Simulation

Modern EDR-XDR-SIEM platforms should provide full visibility into attacks, effective threat detection, and support for incident response processes across endpoint, cloud, and network environments. In practice, however, detection alone is not sufficient to fully understand the course of a cyberattack. It is crucial that the solution provides detailed telemetry and event correlation mechanisms that enable the reconstruction of the full attack chain—from the point of entry, through the execution of subsequent actions, to their impact on systems and data.

In AVLab tests, we focus on verifying precisely these capabilities. We simulate realistic, multi-stage attack scenarios and verify whether the solution provides full telemetry visibility, effective event correlation, and the context necessary for SOC teams to reconstruct an incident from Initial Access to Exfiltration.

The tests are conducted in accordance with recognized industry standards, ensuring the comparability of results, transparency of methodology, and the possibility of independent verification.

Our approach to testing:

  • a clearly defined testing methodology
  • realistic attack scenarios based on actual techniques, not just on theoretical MITRE ATT&CK models
  • replication of real-world incidents and the needs of SOC teams
  • full transparency (scenarios, TTPs, configuration)
  • ability to verify results
  • engineer-to-engineer communication

What do we look out for during this test?

We conduct an independent technical assessment of EDR-XDR-SIEM solutions based on realistic, multi-stage attack scenarios. The goal of the assessment is to verify whether the solution provides sufficient visibility, telemetry, and event correlation to enable a full understanding and reconstruction of an incident. Additionally, we verify the extent to which behavioral analysis and artificial intelligence mechanisms support threat detection, event correlation, analysis of attacker activities, and response and remediation processes.

The test covers the following areas:

Detection and Prevention of Attacks

We test whether the solution detects and blocks attack techniques at various stages, from execution to lateral movement and exfiltration.
ico strzalka orange cienka

Telemetry Visibility

We assess whether the solution collects detailed telemetry, including:

parent-child process relationships

command-line capture

user context and privileges

timestamp integrity
and event consistency

network communications
and DNS activity

file and registry activity

MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping

Single- and Cross-Host Correlation

ico strzalka orange cienka

Attack Chain Reconstruction and Visibility

We are verifying whether it is possible to fully reconstruct the course of the attack, from initial access to exfiltration.
ico strzalka orange cienka

Operational Usability for Blue Teams and SOCs

We assess whether the solution provides sufficient context and data transparency to enable security teams to quickly understand an incident, conduct an analysis, and take appropriate action.

Who are these tests for?

Vendors of EDR, XDR, and SIEM solutions

Independent verification of the solution's feasibility and identification of the product's strengths and weaknesses.

Blue Team, SOC, and cybersecurity departments

Assessment of the solution's usability during incident detection, analysis, and response.

Organizations, SMBs, and system integrators

A comparison of solutions based on a consistent methodology and realistic attack scenarios.

What is in it for you?

Testing Workflow

Attack Scenario Preparation

We develop realistic, multi-stage scenarios (MITRE ATT&CK) that include, among other things, execution, persistence, lateral movement, and exfiltration.

Test Environment Deployment

We set up a controlled environment that encompasses both the victim’s systems (endpoints, Active Directory, network) and the attacker’s infrastructure (e.g., C2, staging servers, exfiltration channels).

Scenario Validation

We verify that all stages of the attack function correctly before conducting the actual test.

Attack Execution

We execute attack scenarios that closely reflect real-world attacker behavior (e.g., user execution, browser downloads, and LOLBins).

Telemetry Collection and Analysis

We evaluate the quality and completeness of telemetry, including process activity, command-line visibility, user context, network telemetry, and cross-host event correlation.
What do we evaluate?
  • Detection and prevention of attack techniques
  • Automated response capabilities
  • Manual response and containment capabilities
  • Effectiveness of behavioral analysis and AI-assisted detection, investigation, and remediation mechanism.

Incident Reconstruction

We verify whether the complete attack chain can be reconstructed based on the available telemetry.

Reporting and Results Review

We deliver a detailed technical report and review the findings.

Example Attack Scenario

The payload is delivered via WebDAV and executed by the user, establishing command-and-control communication. The attack then spreads to another endpoint through SMB file transfer and is remotely executed via WMI, resulting in a multi-stage attack spanning multiple hosts.
This scenario enables the evaluation of detection, telemetry completeness, and cross-host event correlation.

Techniques

MITRE ATT&CK

ico strzalki 3 orange
ico strzalki 3 white

Initial Access & Execution

T1204.002 - User Execution

ico strzalki 3 white

Command and Control

T1071.001 - Web Protocols

ico strzalki 3 white

Lateral Movement

T1021.002 - SMB Admin Shares
T1047 - WMI

ico strzalki 3 white

Exfiltration

T1041 - C2 Exfiltration

What do we evaluate?

  • Attack visibility and detection
  • Telemetry completeness (process, file, registry, and network activity)
  • Process visibility (parent-child relationships and command-line activity)
  • User context and privileges
  • Timestamp integrity and event chronology
  • Single-host and cross-host correlation
  • Attack chain reconstruction and investigation context
  • MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping
  • Remediation and response capabilities
  • Graphical attack visualization

Additional assessment areas:

  • Advanced investigation and query capabilities
  • Raw telemetry access
  • Operational usability for Blue Teams and SOCs
  • Behavioral analytics and AI-assisted analysis

Evaluation from the Security Operations Center Perspective

The solution provides clear visibility into incidents and correlates events across hosts, enabling the identification of lateral movement and the reconstruction of the attack chain. Key artifacts, such as process activity, command-line parameters, user context, and network telemetry, support effective incident analysis. Mapping to MITRE ATT&CK and analysis guidance help understand the attacker’s actions and plan an appropriate response. Access to raw telemetry data is limited, and incident containment actions require analyst intervention due to the lack of automated response and host isolation mechanisms.

On-Demand Testing

We don’t limit ourselves to periodic testing cycles. We offer the option of conducting an independent technical assessment at any time, in accordance with the needs of the manufacturer, integrator, or organization.

Rapid Validation

verification of new product versions and updates

Scenario-Based Testing

e.g., ransomware, lateral movement, fileless attacks

Configuration Validation

verification of configuration and policy changes

Continuous Improvement

iterative enhancement of detection and response capabilities

Threat Adaptation

validation against emerging attack techniques and threats

Telemetry Assessment

evaluation of telemetry quality, visibility, and event correlation

Pre-Deployment Testing

validation before customer rollout

TTP Validation

testing of specific MITRE ATT&CK techniques and procedures

Use-Case Validation

verification of SOC, threat hunting, and customer-specific detection scenarios

Benchmarking and Regression Testing

validation against previous versions and competitors

If you need an independent evaluation of attack visibility and telemetry quality, contact us today.

Attack Visibility in Telemetry | Two-Level Certification

The certification is based on the solution's ability to provide sufficient visibility into attacks in the telemetry data, enabling the analysis, understanding, and reconstruction of security incidents.

Modern EDR, XDR, and SIEM platforms provide comprehensive mechanisms for monitoring and analyzing events. As part of our AVLab testing, we assess whether a solution provides sufficient context and telemetry data to understand the course of an attack, trace its successive stages, and evaluate the impact of the incident on the IT environment.
AVLab CERT EDR XDR GOLD 2026

LEVEL 2

Awarded to solutions that provide comprehensive telemetry enabling event correlation and the reconstruction of the full attack chain, including connections between hosts and the various stages of an incident.
AVLab CERT EDR XDR 2026

LEVEL 1

Awarded to solutions that detect the tested techniques and provide sufficient telemetry to identify events and analyze their context.

The certification confirms the solution's ability to provide visibility into attacks, deliver valuable telemetry, and support incident analysis and reconstruction.

Certified Solutions in the Latest Edition

Bitdefender logo
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR
CrowdStrike logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR
Elastic logo
Elastic Defend XDR
METRAS logo
Metras XDR
threatdown logo
ThreatDown EDR
With secure logo
WithSecure Elements EPP + EDR
AVLab CERT EDR XDR GOLD 2026
AVLab CERT EDR XDR 2026

Why is it worth having the certificate?

Join the developers certificated by the independent organization.

Use the certificate for marketing purposes, e.g. place it on your website, promote your company in a magazine, allow potential customers to see that you own a reputable solution.

Safely test out your solution in a controlled environment.

Receive feedback and improve the effectiveness of your security product.

Collaboration

How to Join the EDR-XDR-SIEM Evaluation?

1

Initial Consultation

Definition of the test scope, attack scenarios, and technical objectives.
2

Solution Review

Provision of licenses, configuration details, and deployment guidelines (policies, operating modes, integrations).
3

Environment Setup

Preparation of the test environment according to the solution requirements.
4

Test Execution

Execution of attack scenarios, followed by telemetry collection and analysis.
5

Reporting and Results Review

Delivery of a detailed technical report and discussion of the findings.
6

Certification (Optional)

Awarding of a certification based on the achieved results, with permission to use it for marketing and promotional purposes.

If you want to validate attack visibility, telemetry quality, and incident reconstruction capabilities...

Commitment to Independent Testing

Since 2012, we have conducted security testing of endpoint protection, EDR, and XDR solutions.

Our experience includes multi-stage, fileless, and living-off-the-land attack scenarios, as well as collaboration with security technology vendors.

We are a participant in the Microsoft Virus Initiative (MVI), which enables us to collaborate with the Microsoft security ecosystem and provides access to information relevant to the testing of security solutions.

We operate in accordance with AMTSO standards, which define transparency, repeatability, and objectivity in security testing. Participation in AMTSO entails the use of recognized testing practices, such as configuration transparency, verifiable results, and collaboration with vendors during the preparation and execution of tests.

VIEW AMTSO COMPLIANCE REPORT:
Contact with AVLab

Collaboration & Contact

We welcome security vendors and technology providers interested in independent testing, certification, and technical evaluations.