Recent Results in March 2023

Latest DATA FROM OUR TESTING SYSTEM

Threat landscape in March 2023

tested
solutions
0
unique
SAMPLES
0
malware hosted over HTTP
0
malware hosted over HTTPS
0
average malicious changes [1]
0
PRE-LAUNCH level prevention
0 %
POST-LAUNCH level protection
0 %
average blocked malware [2]
0 %

[1] The number of harmful changes made to Windows during dynamic analysis of the malware sample.
[2] Average blocking of malware by all tested solutions, regardless of level of prevention or protection.
Remember! HTTPS protocol can be used to host malware!
SSL certificate and the so-called padlock at the web address does not certify safety of the website.

TOP 3

HIJACKED SERVERS LOCATION

0
0
0

TOP 3

TLD COMPROMISED DOMAINS

0

.com

0

.org

0

.su

0

DOMAINS WITH MALICIOUS FILES

0

IP ADDRESSES WITH MALICIOUS FILES

Malware Comparison Table in March 2023

The following summary shows a comparison of tested solutions to protect workstations against malware. We encourage you to become familiar with a detailed description and read our testing methodology in order to understand the results.

PRE-LAUNCH: The classification concerns detecting malware samples before they are launched in the system.
POST-LAUNCH: The analysis level, i.e. a virus has been run and blocked by a tested product.
FAIL: The failure, i.e. a virus hasn’t been blocked and it has infected a system.
Sandbox Column: Number of indicators, i.e. malicious changes made to the system without the anti-virus installed.

Remediation Time Average (RT): The time expressed in seconds from the introduction of malware into the system by a browser, through the launch to detecting and resolving security incident. Occurs only at the POST-Launch level.

Recent Results in March 2023

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office
PRE-LAUNCH:
93.12%
POST-LAUNCH:
6.88%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 4 seconds

Avast Free Antivirus
PRE-LAUNCH:
95.06%
POST-LAUNCH:
4.94%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 30 seconds

Avira Antivirus Pro
PRE-LAUNCH:
95.94%
POST-LAUNCH:
4.06%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 207 seconds

Bitdefender Antivirus Free
PRE-LAUNCH:
90.12%
POST-LAUNCH:
8.99%
FAIL:
0.88%

Blocked: 562/567
Total: 99.12%
Fail: 5
RT: 54 seconds

Emsisoft Business Security
PRE-LAUNCH:
59.08%
POST-LAUNCH:
40.92%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 242 seconds

F-Secure
PRE-LAUNCH:
83.25%
POST-LAUNCH:
16.05%
FAIL:
0.71%

Blocked: 563/567
Total: 99.29%
FAIL: 4
RT: 27 seconds

Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
PRE-LAUNCH:
89.42%
POST-LAUNCH:
10.58%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 221

Malwarebytes Premium
PRE-LAUNCH:
89.59%
POST-LAUNCH:
10.41%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 219

Microsoft Defender
PRE-LAUNCH:
15.7%
POST-LAUNCH:
83.6%
FAIL:
0.7%

Blocked: 563/567
Total: 99.29%
Fail: 4

RT: 122 seconds

Webroot Antivirus
PRE-LAUNCH:
43.03%
POST-LAUNCH:
56.97%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 25 seconds

Xcitium Internet Security
PRE-LAUNCH:
33.33%
POST-LAUNCH:
66.67%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 158 seconds

Xcitium ZeroThreat Advanced
PRE-LAUNCH:
7.94%
POST-LAUNCH:
92.06%

Blocked: 567/567
Total: 100%
RT: 110 seconds

See the previous results

You can always go back in time and check how each individual security product performed during previous editions of the test. We make the results from all previous tests available to you to verify if your favorite developer has improved protection against latest malware in his security software.

Menu