The following summary shows a comparison of tested solutions to protect workstations against malware.
We encourage you to become familiar with a detailed description and read our testing methodology in order to understand the results.
Avast
Free Antivirus
16,49%
–
83,51%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
Avira
Antivirus Pro
LEVEL 1:
LEVEL 2:
LEVEL 3:
FAIL:
76,49%
–
23,22%
0,29%
Blocked: 2044/2050
Total: 99,71%
Comodo
Advanced Endpoint Protection
0,29%
0,05%
99,6%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
Comodo
Internet Security
0,39%
–
99,61%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
Emsisoft
Business Security
–
–
100%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
ESET
Smart Security Premium
100%
–
–
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
Malwarebytes
Premium
LEVEL 1:
LEVEL 2:
LEVEL 3:
3,37%
–
96.63%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
SecureAPlus
Pro
LEVEL 1:
LEVEL 2:
LEVEL 3:
72,15%
–
27,85%
Blocked: 2050/2050
Total: 100%
Webroot
Antivirus
LEVEL 1:
LEVEL 2:
LEVEL 3:
FAIL:
62,55%
2,24%
35,17%
0,05%
Blocked: 2049/2050
Total: 99,95%
The following summary shows a comparison of tested solutions to protect workstations against malware. We encourage you to become familiar with a detailed description and read our testing methodology in order to understand the results.
Level 1: The browser level, i.e. a virus has been stopped before or right after it has been downloaded.
Level 2: The system level, i.e. a virus has been downloaded, but it hasn’t been allowed to run.
Level 3: The analysis level, i.e. a virus has been run and blocked by a tested product.
FAIL: The failure, i.e. a virus hasn’t been blocked and it has infected a system.
Sandbox Column: Number of indicators, i.e. malicious changes made to the system without the anti-virus installed.
You can always go back in time and check how each individual security product performed during previous editions of the test. We make the results from all previous tests available to you to verify if your favorite developer has improved protection against latest malware in his security software.
