Recent Results in May 2023

Latest DATA FROM OUR TESTING SYSTEM

Threat Landscape in May 2023

tested
solutions
0
unique
SAMPLES
0
malware hosted over HTTP
0
malware hosted over HTTPS
0
average malicious changes [1]
0
PRE-LAUNCH level prevention
0 %
POST-LAUNCH level protection
0 %
average blocked malware [2]
0 %
[1] The number of harmful changes made to Windows during dynamic analysis of the malware sample.
[2] Average blocking of malware by all tested solutions, regardless of level of prevention or protection.

TOP 3

HIJACKED SERVERS LOCATION

0
0
0

TOP 3

TLD COMPROMISED DOMAINS

0

.com

0

.org

0

.sh

0

DOMAINS WITH MALICIOUS FILES

0

IP ADDRESSES WITH MALICIOUS FILES

Malware Comparison Table in May 2023

The following summary shows a comparison of tested solutions to protect workstations against malware. We encourage you to become familiar with a detailed description and read our testing methodology in order to understand the results.

PRE-LAUNCH: The classification concerns detecting malware samples before they are launched in the system.
POST-LAUNCH: The analysis level, i.e. a virus has been run and blocked by a tested product.
FAIL: The failure, i.e. a virus hasn’t been blocked and it has infected a system.
Sandbox Column: Number of indicators, i.e. malicious changes made to the system without the anti-virus installed.

Remediation Time Average (RT): The time expressed in seconds from the introduction of malware into the system by a browser, through the launch to detecting and resolving security incident. Occurs only at the POST-Launch level.

Our tests comply with the guidelines of the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization.
Details about the test are available at this website as well as in our methodology.

Recent Results in May 2023

Avast Free Antivirus
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
81.97%
POST-LAUNCH:
18.03%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 43 seconds

Bitdefender Antivirus Free
PRE-LAUNCH:
90.63%
POST-LAUNCH:
8.17%
FAIL:
1.2%

Blocked: 411/416
Total: 98.8%
Fail: 5
RT: 47 seconds

Emsisoft Business Security
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
54.81%
POST-LAUNCH:
45.19%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 181 seconds

G Data Total Security
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
93.99%
POST-LAUNCH:
6.01%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 81 seconds

Kaspersky Plus
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
97.84%
POST-LAUNCH:
2.16%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 164 seconds

Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
89.66%
POST-LAUNCH:
10.34%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 180 seconds

Malwarebytes Premium
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
89.42%
POST-LAUNCH:
10.58%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 209 seconds

Microsoft Defender
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
19.95%
POST-LAUNCH:
79.09%
FAIL:
0.96%

Blocked: 412/416
Total: 99.04%
Fail: 4

RT: 121 seconds

Quick Heal Total Security
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
91.59%
POST-LAUNCH:
8.41%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 36 seconds

Webroot Antivirus
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
51.92%
POST-LAUNCH:
47.84%
FAIL:
0.24%

Blocked: 415/416
Total: 99.76%
Fail: 1
RT: 100 seconds

Xcitium Internet Security
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
45.67%
POST-LAUNCH:
54.33%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 170 seconds

Xcitium ZeroThreat Advanced
excellent
PRE-LAUNCH:
15.14%
POST-LAUNCH:
84.86%

Blocked: 416/416
Total: 100%
RT: 107 seconds

See the previous results

You can always go back in time and check how each individual security product performed during previous editions of the test. We make the results from all previous tests available to you to verify if your favorite developer has improved protection against latest malware in his security software.